Logo
DesignCritiq
New Critique

Analyze Your Design

Upload your design and tell us about the context. We'll return up to 7 prioritized findings — each citing the specific principle violated and where to find it.

Avg. analysis time: 38 seconds

Upload Design

PNG, JPG, WEBP — up to 25MB. Export directly from Figma.

Drag & drop your design

or click to browse

.png.jpg.jpeg.webp
Tip: Export at 2x resolution from Figma for better annotation accuracy.

Evaluation Framework

Choose which design principles to evaluate.

3 of 5 principles selected

What this tool evaluates

We believe in transparency about scope. Here's exactly what we analyze — and what we don't.

✓ In scope

  • Visual hierarchy & attention flow
  • WCAG 2.2 contrast compliance
  • Typography & readability
  • Spacing & layout consistency
  • Nielsen's usability heuristics

✗ Out of scope

  • Interaction & animation timing
  • Full information architecture
  • Gestalt across multi-screen flows
  • Performance or load time
Your files are not stored or used to train our models.

Design Context

Context-aware analysis produces significantly better results. The more specific you are, the more actionable the feedback.

What kind of product is this screen for?

How mature is this design?

Who is the primary user of this screen? (e.g. "Non-technical SMB owner, 35–50, low digital literacy")

What should the user do or feel after seeing this screen? This shapes which usability heuristics we weight most heavily.

Optional. Knowing the system helps us flag token inconsistencies. (e.g. Material 3, Ant Design, custom)

Anything else we should know — known issues, specific concerns, accessibility requirements.

Save as context profile

Reuse this brief for future critiques — saves time on repeat projects.

By submitting, you confirm this file is yours to analyze. We never store files or use them for training.